🧭 HOW TO USE
Start with the property card (market value, outstanding loan, SSD holding period, lock-in), then the owners (2 by default; switch to 3 for parent+couple or sibling cases — all non-keepers exit) — the transferred share %, who keeps the property (or let the tool recommend by checking both directions), each spouse's age / income / other debts, and the exiting spouse's CPF (enter the exact figure from the CPF portal, or leave 0 for a proportional estimate). Toggle the next purchase on to test the freed spouse's new 75% LTV loan and see the ABSD avoided. Everything recalculates live — read the Quick Answer hero, then the Who Keeps What solo-TDSR card (the usual deal-killer), the Two Separate Transactions money map, and the verdict. Set the OTP date and exercise/completion periods in the Timing card to get a dated timeline. Share buttons at the bottom send the plan by WhatsApp/email or print to PDF.
🏢 Private property only
Decoupling by part-sale between spouses works for private property only — since 2016 HDB allows spousal transfers only in limited cases (divorce, financial hardship), not to avoid ABSD.
💰 BSD on the share — at market value
The buying spouse pays BSD on the market value of the share transferred (1/2/3/4/5/6% progressive tiers), with a formal valuation — IRAS expects market value regardless of the price written. ABSD on the buyout itself is $0 only if the keeper owns no other residential property. SSD applies to the exiting spouse's share if the property has been held under 4 years: 16/12/8/4% in years 1–4 (purchases from 4 Jul 2025), $0 from the start of Year 5.
📐 Solo TDSR — the deal-killer
After decoupling each spouse faces TDSR 55% alone, stress-tested at 4% p.a.: the keeper on the refinanced loan (plus any buyout draw), the freed spouse on the new purchase. Rental income doesn't count without a signed tenancy on that specific property. Tenure for the full LTV band: loan ends by 65 within 30 years. The buyout draw on the refinance is capped by both 75% LTV and the keeper's own TDSR — the rest comes from cash/CPF.
🧮 CPF refund — follows usage, NOT the ownership share
The exiting spouse refunds every CPF dollar they personally used plus accrued interest at 2.5%/yr compounded to their own OA — regardless of share size. A 1% owner who used $300k of CPF still refunds the full $300k + interest. When the consideration for a tiny share can't cover it, the difference must be produced in cash (loans not allowed) — the classic 99-1 negative-cashflow trap. The cash resurfaces in their OA (reusable for the next purchase), but the family needs the liquidity upfront.
⚖️ Sequencing & 99-1
The transfer must legally complete before the freed spouse exercises the next purchase — owning any share on the purchase date triggers ABSD. Engineered 99-1 splits set up purely to transfer cheaply are what IRAS audits (2025 High Court: ABSD recovered plus surcharge); genuine splits at the original purchase are standard conveyancing. Two law firms required (~$6k total); check the loan lock-in for a ~1.5% penalty before refinancing.
🗂️ ASSUMPTIONS & EVIDENCE — before anyone relies on these numbers
Every figure above is only as good as the document behind it. A conveyancing file would hold all of these before signing anything — tick them off:
☐ Market value → formal valuation report
The tool uses your entered value; IRAS expects the transfer at market value and BSD is computed on it. Get a valuation from the keeper's financing bank (panel valuer) or an independent licensed valuer — a screenshot of a portal estimate is not evidence.
☐ Outstanding loan → bank redemption statement
Exact redemption figure as at the intended completion date, including any lock-in penalty and the notice period (typically 3 months or interest in lieu). The letter of offer confirms whether the lock-in still applies.
☐ Manner of holding → title search (INLIS)
Joint tenancy must be severed into a tenancy-in-common before a part-share transfer. The title search confirms joint tenancy vs tenancy-in-common and the exact shares held — don't assume 50/50 from memory.
☐ SSD holding period → exercised OTP / S&P date
The SSD clock runs from the original purchase date. The exercised option or sale & purchase agreement is the evidence — one month wrong can cost 4% of the share value.
☐ CPF used + accrued interest → CPF Property statement (both owners)
Screenshots from each owner's CPF portal (Home ownership dashboard) showing principal and accrued interest per member. This settles the refund and the cash top-up — the tool's estimate is a placeholder, never the number a firm relies on.
☐ Solo incomes & debts → NOA / payslips + credit report
Latest Notice of Assessment or 3 months' payslips per spouse (variable income takes the 30% haircut), plus a credit bureau report for other monthly obligations. TDSR is tested on documents, not declarations.
☐ The refinance → In-Principle Approval in the keeper's sole name
The single most important gate: a bank IPA for the full refinanced quantum (existing loan + any buyout draw) on the keeper's income alone, before signing the transfer. The workings box above shows the quantum to request.
☐ The next purchase → IPA for the freed spouse
If the point is the next property, the freed spouse needs their own IPA at 75% LTV — and the transfer must legally complete before they exercise any OTP.
☐ Keeper's ABSD position → declaration of no other residential property
$0 ABSD on the buyout assumes the keeper owns no other residential property (including overseas-held interests counted by IRAS profile). Confirm in writing.
☐ Two law firms → engagement letters + fee quotes
One firm cannot act for both sides of the transfer. The ~$6,000 here is an estimate — replace it with the actual quotes.
With all ten in the file, every number above stops being an assumption. Missing any one of them is where decouplings fall apart at completion.
🩺 Property Doctor line
Conservative estimates to guide the conversation — not a bank, IRAS or CPF assessment. Verify the refinance in-principle, the exact CPF figures and the valuation before signing anything. If the numbers say the structure fails, or that pay-&-reclaim / sell-first is cheaper, this tool will say so — that's the point.